SCRIPTURE AS HISTORY: Does Ancient Near Eastern Evidence Support the General Accuracy of the Earliest Biblical Accounts
En stock
0.31 kg
Sí
Nuevo
Amazon
USA
- Ever since the philosopher Erasmus attacked Luther, many scholars have chosen to reject historical claims made in the early biblical books unless those claims can be proven by irrefutable evidence. Historical events in the Bible are declared to be myths without supporting evidence for those claims. Today, we live in a different world. Science was once believed to be at war with the Bible. Christians thought that they had to create a rival kind of science called "Creation Science" and "Flood Geology" to defend the Bible against conclusions drawn in the mainstream sciences. It is doubtful that creating a rival science was ever a good idea, and it led to a general rejection of Christianity in the academic world. However, the tide has turned. Today, mainstream science has sometimes found evidence that strongly defends of early biblical traditions if both the Bible and the scientific evidence are properly understood. Today, the search for truth must be pursued in an honest and open way with the assumption that the Bible will be proven correct if it is properly understood, and if the historical, archaeological, and climatological evidence is interpreted in an objective way.
IMPORT EASILY
By purchasing this product you can deduct VAT with your RUT number